Butchers of Sopore and Birmingham

Nine years of calm before icy storm

Kashmir turns crimson with blood of Pandits

AN UN-ISLAMIC KIDNAPPING AND CHAOS IN THE VALLEY

The illusion of azaadi and Kashmir’s historic deception

How Pak's terror policy evolved in Kashmir

Birth of social media jihadists, death of Article-370

Operation Sindoor: When Indian missiles rained on Pak terror parade

<div class='ite_mg_banner ads__container'><div class='it_mg_bnrBox'><div class='ite_bnr_cont'><div class='ite_cont_dtl'> <h4>Mood of the Nation Offer:  Use promo code <span class='bold_text'> MOTN2026 </span> to get<span class='bold_text'> ₹500 off</span> on all Print + Digital subscriptions</h4><a href='https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsubscriptions.intoday.in%2Findiatoday%3Futm_source%3Dtop-web-banner ' class='ite_subscribe_btn origin_conscent_url' target='_blank'>SUBSCRIBE</a></div></div></div></div>

US Election coverage

India

World

NewsMo

Fact Check

Programmes

Match Schedule

Teams

Player Stats

Match Report

LIVE SCORES

<div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998October%2Fmissiles2_081812104151.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><p>From the dawn of air warfare in the 1930s, science fiction has toyed with the vision of a shield against missiles.</p><p>In the '80s, for a brief while, the idea leapt from the pages of the Flash Gordon comic strip into the concept of the Strategic Defence Initiative a.k.a. Star Wars. Very soon, faced with the hurdles of technology and scientific scepticism, it atrophied.</p><p>The idea has now been reborn in India. Playing on fears of Pakistani and Chinese missiles and nuclear weapons, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), which played a key role in India's May nuclear tests, has along with the Air Force and Army embarked on a ballistic missile defence project which could undermine stated commitments that India would construct only a "minimum nuclear deterrent".</p><p>This could trigger a destabilising arms race with Pakistan and China.<br><br>The DRDO project, cleared by the Government last month, will integrate a number of high-end Russian-made anti-aircraft-cum-anti-ballistic missile systems that the Army and Air Force want to acquire - like the Russian S-300V and S-300P systems - with an Israeli fire control radar and battle management system to serve as an anti-missile shield.</p><p>Current estimates for a limited shield around Delhi are pegged at Rs 2,000 crore but anyone familiar with defence budgeting will realise the costs are likely to be 10 times that amount and that too only for the national capital's protection.<br><br>The system envisaged can deal with Pakistani M-11 type missiles but not the longer range Ghauri or Chinese strategic missiles whose peak velocity can be in the order of 4 km per second. There are other imponderables as well. Instead of committing itself to a "no-first-use" pledge, Pakistan is likely to field nuclear-tipped missiles ready for launch with very little time for counter-measures.<br><br>"If I were a Pakistani," says an expert, "I would increase my arsenal two or threefold." This is what the Soviets threatened to do when the Reagan administration unveiled Star Wars.</p><div class="itemcenter"><amp-iframe height="62" title="" width="320" sandbox="allow-forms allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-top-navigation allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation" allowfullscreen src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Findiatoday%2Fbanner%2Fpreferred-source-new.html%3Fv%3D1.014%5Cu0026native%3D1" class="mrBt15 preferred-source-banner"> </amp-iframe></div></p><p>Pushed by Republican right-wingers, the US has since spent $50 billion (Rs 2,12,500 crore) on its National Missile Defence (NMD) system but has yet to field anything capable of defending a single US city against a missile attack. While the US can afford to spend tens of billions of dollars, India cannot afford to be that profligate.<br><br>But even with the projected expenditure, can the DRDO deliver? It has been 15 years since it started the Integrated Missile Development Programme to build among other things two types of anti-aircraft missiles - Trishul and Akash. There are no indications as yet that the missiles - will be inducted into the Indian arsenal in the near future.</p><p>The latest setback came last month at the Balasore test range when India's Patriot-clone Akash failed to engage a slow-flying Nishant remote-piloted vehicle. DRDO officials say this was the first test using an indigenously developed Rajendra phased array radar and that they are "very encouraged" by the results.</p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998October%2Fmissiles-sml_082012123853.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div></p><p>Experts say that there is a larger objection to any anti-ballistic missile programme. Minimum nuclear deterrence and a ballistic missile defence system do not go together.</p><p>"Currently India, China and Pakistan or for that matter Russia and America have a kind of a stable deterrence based on the vulnerability to each other's nuclear weapons," says one expert. Creating a shield such as the one envisaged by the DRDO may look nice on paper but in practice it will compel China and Pakistan to take counter-measures which will up the ante all around.</p><p>At the root of the problem lies the confusion over what the deterrence theory is all about. Nuclear weapons, says defence analyst K. Subrahmanyam, are not weapons of defence in the conventional sense. "Instead of being used, they are meant to deter such weapons from being used."</p><p>The debate over defence and deterrence was what the SALT-I (Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty) agreement was all about. It was clinched in favour of "deterrence" with both the US and the USSR agreeing to sign the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty (ABM) that sharply limits such weapon systems.</p><p>"The present confusion is the result of politicians not being able to differentiate between the job of scientists and strategists," says Subrahmanyam, adding that when this happens scientists will run away with the strategic agenda.<br><br>Having initiated the nuclear arms race, the Russians and Americans realised the futility of such systems and signed the 1972 ABM which many consider the "foundation of strategic stability" between the two.</p><p>The 100 ground-based interceptor missiles that both have at a single site each are more of a holdover of that era rather than a commitment to anti-ballistic missile defence. The Gulf War and the proliferation of missiles in the region propelled the US to call for the Theatre Missile Defence system which has since been expanded as the NMD.<br></p><table><tbody><tr><td> <b>"The DRDO earlier advocated making the unstoppable ballistic missiles. Now it wants a shield against them."</b></td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>But most critics see this as more of a political project whose viability is questionable.</p><p>The same Republican-dominated US Congress that once advocated Star Wars is pumping more money than is required into the programme.</p><p>The American thrust for anti-ballistic missile defence stems from the requirement of its armed forces committed to conflicts outside the US with much less capable adversaries. </p><p>Despite its grandiose title, the NMD does not intend to provide the US with a shield against Russian or Chinese missiles but against "rogue states" whose missiles, in the near future, can engage US troops stationed near them such as those in the Persian Gulf and Japan.</p><p>At present, the only anti-ballistic missile systems deployed are the Russian S-300V and the Patriot (PAC3), both capable of handling only short-range Scud-type missiles. </p><p>The NMD is trying to develop a series of missiles that will take the battle to outer space - such as the Theatre High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) system and the Exo-atmospheric Reentry Vehicle System (ERIS).</p><p>Both these projects are already suffering from cost overruns and technical glitches. The only success seems to be the US-Israeli Arrow 2 missile but it may not work against long-range missiles such as the Iranian Shahab. Critics charge that even if the NMD works, it will counter only 12 missiles in a battle.<br><br>The Indian context is different. The country must deal with the missile forces of two adversaries which are numerous and proximate. Any conflict involving ballistic missiles runs the imminent risk of becoming an all-out strategic war involving nuclear weapons. DRDO officials don't want to comment on the issue.</p><p>But it is ironical that through the late '80s it was the DRDO and its chief A.P. J. Abdul Kalam who urged India to make ballistic missiles because they were unstoppable. Now they want to construct a shield against them. Perhaps this is what the arms race is all about.</p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Oct 19, 1999</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

defence

Defence

<div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998October%2Fmissiles2_081812104151.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><p>From the dawn of air warfare in the 1930s, science fiction has toyed with the vision of a shield against missiles.</p><p>In the '80s, for a brief while, the idea leapt from the pages of the Flash Gordon comic strip into the concept of the Strategic Defence Initiative a.k.a. Star Wars. Very soon, faced with the hurdles of technology and scientific scepticism, it atrophied.</p><p>The idea has now been reborn in India. Playing on fears of Pakistani and Chinese missiles and nuclear weapons, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), which played a key role in India's May nuclear tests, has along with the Air Force and Army embarked on a ballistic missile defence project which could undermine stated commitments that India would construct only a "minimum nuclear deterrent".</p><p>This could trigger a destabilising arms race with Pakistan and China.<br><br>The DRDO project, cleared by the Government last month, will integrate a number of high-end Russian-made anti-aircraft-cum-anti-ballistic missile systems that the Army and Air Force want to acquire - like the Russian S-300V and S-300P systems - with an Israeli fire control radar and battle management system to serve as an anti-missile shield.</p><p>Current estimates for a limited shield around Delhi are pegged at Rs 2,000 crore but anyone familiar with defence budgeting will realise the costs are likely to be 10 times that amount and that too only for the national capital's protection.<br><br>The system envisaged can deal with Pakistani M-11 type missiles but not the longer range Ghauri or Chinese strategic missiles whose peak velocity can be in the order of 4 km per second. There are other imponderables as well. Instead of committing itself to a "no-first-use" pledge, Pakistan is likely to field nuclear-tipped missiles ready for launch with very little time for counter-measures.<br><br>"If I were a Pakistani," says an expert, "I would increase my arsenal two or threefold." This is what the Soviets threatened to do when the Reagan administration unveiled Star Wars.</p><div class="itemcenter"><iframe scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="62" awidth="320" aheight="62" amplayout="fixed" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Findiatoday%2Fbanner%2Fpreferred-source-new.html%3Fv%3D1.014" class="preferred-source-banner" loading="lazy"></iframe></div><style>.preferred-source-banner{  margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom:10px;}</style></p><p>Pushed by Republican right-wingers, the US has since spent $50 billion (Rs 2,12,500 crore) on its National Missile Defence (NMD) system but has yet to field anything capable of defending a single US city against a missile attack. While the US can afford to spend tens of billions of dollars, India cannot afford to be that profligate.<br><br>But even with the projected expenditure, can the DRDO deliver? It has been 15 years since it started the Integrated Missile Development Programme to build among other things two types of anti-aircraft missiles - Trishul and Akash. There are no indications as yet that the missiles - will be inducted into the Indian arsenal in the near future.</p><p>The latest setback came last month at the Balasore test range when India's Patriot-clone Akash failed to engage a slow-flying Nishant remote-piloted vehicle. DRDO officials say this was the first test using an indigenously developed Rajendra phased array radar and that they are "very encouraged" by the results.</p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998October%2Fmissiles-sml_082012123853.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:200px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998October%2Fmissiles-lag_082012123853.jpg','window','status=no,resize=yes,toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes,width=921,height=883'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div></p><p>Experts say that there is a larger objection to any anti-ballistic missile programme. Minimum nuclear deterrence and a ballistic missile defence system do not go together.</p><p>"Currently India, China and Pakistan or for that matter Russia and America have a kind of a stable deterrence based on the vulnerability to each other's nuclear weapons," says one expert. Creating a shield such as the one envisaged by the DRDO may look nice on paper but in practice it will compel China and Pakistan to take counter-measures which will up the ante all around.</p><p>At the root of the problem lies the confusion over what the deterrence theory is all about. Nuclear weapons, says defence analyst K. Subrahmanyam, are not weapons of defence in the conventional sense. "Instead of being used, they are meant to deter such weapons from being used."</p><p>The debate over defence and deterrence was what the SALT-I (Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty) agreement was all about. It was clinched in favour of "deterrence" with both the US and the USSR agreeing to sign the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty (ABM) that sharply limits such weapon systems.</p><p>"The present confusion is the result of politicians not being able to differentiate between the job of scientists and strategists," says Subrahmanyam, adding that when this happens scientists will run away with the strategic agenda.<br><br>Having initiated the nuclear arms race, the Russians and Americans realised the futility of such systems and signed the 1972 ABM which many consider the "foundation of strategic stability" between the two.</p><p>The 100 ground-based interceptor missiles that both have at a single site each are more of a holdover of that era rather than a commitment to anti-ballistic missile defence. The Gulf War and the proliferation of missiles in the region propelled the US to call for the Theatre Missile Defence system which has since been expanded as the NMD.<br></p><table style="margin-right: 5px; background-color: rgb(229, 229, 229);" align="left" border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" height="42" width="286"><tbody><tr><td> <b>"The DRDO earlier advocated making the unstoppable ballistic missiles. Now it wants a shield against them."</b></td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>But most critics see this as more of a political project whose viability is questionable.</p><p>The same Republican-dominated US Congress that once advocated Star Wars is pumping more money than is required into the programme.</p><p>The American thrust for anti-ballistic missile defence stems from the requirement of its armed forces committed to conflicts outside the US with much less capable adversaries. </p><p>Despite its grandiose title, the NMD does not intend to provide the US with a shield against Russian or Chinese missiles but against "rogue states" whose missiles, in the near future, can engage US troops stationed near them such as those in the Persian Gulf and Japan.</p><p>At present, the only anti-ballistic missile systems deployed are the Russian S-300V and the Patriot (PAC3), both capable of handling only short-range Scud-type missiles. </p><p>The NMD is trying to develop a series of missiles that will take the battle to outer space - such as the Theatre High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) system and the Exo-atmospheric Reentry Vehicle System (ERIS).</p><p>Both these projects are already suffering from cost overruns and technical glitches. The only success seems to be the US-Israeli Arrow 2 missile but it may not work against long-range missiles such as the Iranian Shahab. Critics charge that even if the NMD works, it will counter only 12 missiles in a battle.<br><br>The Indian context is different. The country must deal with the missile forces of two adversaries which are numerous and proximate. Any conflict involving ballistic missiles runs the imminent risk of becoming an all-out strategic war involving nuclear weapons. DRDO officials don't want to comment on the issue.</p><p>But it is ironical that through the late '80s it was the DRDO and its chief A.P. J. Abdul Kalam who urged India to make ballistic missiles because they were unstoppable. Now they want to construct a shield against them. Perhaps this is what the arms race is all about.</p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Oct 19, 1999</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

Playing on fears of Pakistani and Chinese missiles, the DRDO embarks on a Rs 2,000 crore project to protect Delhi. But as the US experience shows, such a system is thin against long-range missiles.

India Today

Dubious shield - India Today

Playing on fears of Pak-Sino missiles, DRDO embarks on defence project to protect Delhi

Dubious shield

Actor Celina Jaitley has sought Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s intervention for the release of her brother, former Special Forces officer Major Vikrant Jaitley, detained in the UAE since September 2024. 

Celina Jaitly

Modi ji, bring soldier back: Celina Jaitley in tears over brother's UAE detention

A video showing an 80-year-old woman left alone at Mandsaur bus stand in Madhya Pradesh has left the internet condemning the inhuman act by her family.

old woman

Elderly woman allegedly abandoned by family, found crying at MP bus stand

Lucky Ali has supported Arijit Singh’s decision to quit playback singing, and said that "it’s not a loss." Ali suggested that something must have snapped for Singh to take this stand, emphasising the importance of expressing oneself away from the music industry's existing constraints.

Lucky Ali backs Arijit Singh on quitting playback: Make your own road

Lucky Ali

According to National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data, juveniles were involved in 31,365 crimes in 2023. That year, 40,036 children were arrested—nearly 79 percent of them between 16 and 18 years old.

Crime News

Know your laws: How kids' crimes expose chinks in legal system

Former India pacer Chetan Sharma expects Pakistan to reverse their boycott of the India match after the Bangladesh elections. The Pakistan government have denied permission to their cricket team to play against India.

Chetan Sharma at Salaam Cricket 2026 (Internal Photo)

Pak will make a U-turn on India boycott stance after February 12: Chetan Sharma

Play Time!

PM Modi

Parliament Budget Session

WPL 2026 Final

Bharat Taxi

Donald Trump

Mamata Banerjee

IND vs AFG LIVE Score

Rahul Gandhi

Dhurandhar 2

T20 World Cup

Border 2

In this address, Prime Minister Narendra Modi outlines India's trajectory towards becoming a developed nation, emphasizing that the country has reached a decisive stage in its journey. He highlights that 'The world is moving very fast towards a new world order,' with India positioned as a reliable 'Vishwa Mitra' or global friend. The Prime Minister notes that while many developed nations are aging, India’s strength lies in its youthful population and significant talent pool. He contrasts the current economic stability—characterized by high growth and low inflation—with the previous 'Fragile Five' status, noting India's progress toward becoming the world's third-largest economy. Modi also mentions recent 'future-ready' trade deals, including significant negotiations with the European Union, and asserts India's role as a leading voice for the Global South on the international stage.

World moving towards a new world order: PM Modi in Rajya Sabha

Opposition leaders staged a walkout from the Rajya Sabha during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's reply to the Motion of Thanks to President address on Thursday.

Walkout

Opposition leaders stage walkout during PM Modi’s address in Rajya Sabha

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla said he had advised Prime Minister Narendra Modi not to come to the House as Opposition MPs had surrounded his chair on Wednesday.

Speaker Om Birla reveals why PM Modi did not address Lok Sabha

Here's the drone visuals of the massive traffic jam on the Mumbai-Pune Expressway, which has hit vehicular movement for over 24 hours after a gas tanker overturned in the hilly Khandala Ghat section.

drone

Watch: Drone visuals of massive 22-km traffic jam on Mumbai-Pune Expressway

Addressing the Lok Sabha, Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said the government has successfully safeguarded sensitive sectors in US trade deal.  

Piyush Goyal: No Compromise On Farmers Interests In US Deal

Download App

Mood of the Nation Offer: Use promo code MOTN2026 to get ₹500 off on all Print + Digital subscriptions

Playing on fears of Pak-Sino missiles, DRDO embarks on defence project to protect Delhi

Playing on fears of Pakistani and Chinese missiles, the DRDO embarks on a Rs 2,000 crore project to protect Delhi. But as the US experience shows, such a system is thin against long-range missiles.

PUBLICATIONS

TELEVISION

EVENTS

RADIO

GAMING

USEFUL LINKS

PRINTING

WELFARE

DISTRIBUTION

SYNDICATIONS

WEBSITES

EDUCATION