Butchers of Sopore and Birmingham

Nine years of calm before icy storm

Kashmir turns crimson with blood of Pandits

AN UN-ISLAMIC KIDNAPPING AND CHAOS IN THE VALLEY

The illusion of azaadi and Kashmir’s historic deception

How Pak's terror policy evolved in Kashmir

Birth of social media jihadists, death of Article-370

Operation Sindoor: When Indian missiles rained on Pak terror parade

<div class='ite_mg_banner ads__container'><div class='it_mg_bnrBox'><div class='ite_bnr_cont'><div class='ite_cont_dtl'> <h4>Subscribe to India Today Print + Digital. Your First Month Is On Us. <span class='bold_text'> ₹299/month</span> thereafter. Cancel anytime.</h4><a href='https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsubscriptions.intoday.in%2Findiatoday%3Futm_source%3Dtop-web-banner ' class='ite_subscribe_btn origin_conscent_url' target='_blank'>SUBSCRIBE</a></div></div></div></div>

US Election coverage

India

World

NewsMo

Fact Check

Programmes

Match Schedule

Teams

Player Stats

Match Report

LIVE SCORES

<div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998April%2Fmaharashtra1_083012014418.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><p>Pushing 80, M.H. Prabhu pays roughly Rs 45 a month for his 600 sq ft tenement in Chikalwadi Blocks in south Mumbai. But he also coughs up 148 per cent property tax and nearly 10 per cent as other taxes for the same premises.</p><p> Add to that the varying amounts of repair cess, and the pensioner ends up paying Rs 200. Consider this too: in the early 1950s, when Prabhu first moved in, he made a down payment of Rs 570, a princely amount for someone earning Rs 12 a month. That pugree amount ensured for the landlord a return on investment.</p><p>Beginning this month, Prabhu will have to pay a higher rent. The question is how much more. Like him, there are nearly two million people in 19,642 buildings in Mumbai waiting for April 17 for the Supreme Court to decide on the issue. </p><p>Accordingly, they will either pay 5 per cent more for the following year with manifold increases after that. Or, in the worst-case scenario, pay 32 times the present amount, plus taxes. They may no longer be protected under the contentious Rent Act of 1947.</p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998April%2Fmaharashtra2_083012014418.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img>CORNERED: The Government is expected to rationalise rent and provide affordable accommodation for chawl tenants but leaders like Murli Deora say the will is missing.</div></p><p>No wonder then that nearly 700 meetings of tenants from various areas have been held in the past 10 weeks. A recent rally at Azad Maidan had about one lakh tenants putting up a spirited fight for a fair deal. "Yes, it's a flashpoint," says state Housing Minister Sureshdada Jain. "We are trying to avoid an uprising."</p><p>The efforts notwithstanding, the Shiv Sena-BJP Government seems to have only added fuel to the fire. It was common knowledge that the Rent Act, after 20 extensions over the years, would expire on March 31, 1998. </p><div class="itemcenter"><amp-iframe height="62" title="" width="320" sandbox="allow-forms allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-top-navigation allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation" allowfullscreen src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Findiatoday%2Fbanner%2Fpreferred-source-new.html%3Fv%3D1.014%5Cu0026native%3D1" class="mrBt15 preferred-source-banner"> </amp-iframe></div></p><p>The state Government was expected to rationalise the rental market, protect the small chawl tenants and bring the entire state under one law instead of the three different Acts that exist now. Rationalisation would mean fixing responsibilities for landlords and tenants, deciding on tenancy for legal heirs, providing for repairs of rented premises besides, of course, increasing rent.</p><p>As the national debate on the Model Rent Control Bill of 1992 raged, the Maharashtra Assembly was already considering a more comprehensive bill moved by the Sharad Pawar government in 1993 to replace the Rent Act. </p><p>The bill was subsequently referred to a joint select committee of the state legislature. But the committee has just met four times in the tenure of the present Government. "It's a case of the Government dragging its feet," charges Opposition leader Chhagan Bhujbal. "If it wanted, it could have brought in the new Act earlier and we wouldn't have had any of the present problems."</p><p>Landlords were pressing for rent decontrol; tenants wanted protection. Putting the issue on the backburner was easy for the alliance Government, bogged down as it was by internal contradictions. However, it's exacting a heavy price now. A spate of cases that began in 1986-87 in the Mumbai High Court ended up in the Supreme Court last year. </p><p>The December 19, 1997, judgement now under review with the final order expected on April 17 put the Government in a tight spot. It ordered a "fair and reasonable" increase in rents and left the Government with little option but to adopt the Model Rent Control Act. </p><p>The Government hurriedly effected the 5 per cent increase for premises leased before October 1, 1987 the cut-off date when rents were decontrolled for new buildings and leases by an amendment and extended the life of the Rent Act by a year.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><b>In the worst-case scenario rents may go up 32 times, plus taxes.</b></td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>The move has opened a can of worms. "Why only 5 per cent, why not 2 per cent or 20 per cent?" asks landlord S. Saboonchi. Associations of landlords and property owners are gearing up to challenge the increase in the apex court. </p><p>More important, the larger issue of rented premises has been narrowed down to a problem of rent increase. Says Chandrashekhar Prabhu, urban planner: "It's unrealistic to focus only on rent increase. You have to look at the total of pugree, taxes and rent."<br><br>Though archaic, the Rent Act is rooted in the peculiar conditions that prevail in Mumbai. In the past, affordable rents and tenant protection were necessary to attract the middle and working classes, who formed the backbone of the metro's economy. To move into any rental premises today, a tenant under the pugree system must pay the existing market rate in that area, usually an amount equal to what he would pay to buy it. </p><p>Between 30 per cent and 40 per cent of the pugree goes to the landlord and the rest to the old tenant. This apart from the rent that he will pay every month. With a large majority of tenements changing hands regularly, the landlord makes substantial gains each time a new tenant walks in.</p><p> Far from providing affordable accommodation, rents are now considered a return on investments. "Landlords have received huge returns considering they didn't pay to buy the land," says Anil Goenka, convener of the Federation of Tenants Associations.<br><br>An equally significant issue is the dismal state of old buildings. Landlords, under the pretext of insufficient revenue, refuse to maintain and repair their premises. As a result, hundreds of buildings are on the verge of collapse. </p><p>To get around this problem, the Government set up the Repairs Board and began to charge a repair cess from tenants. Landlords are also free to demand what they fancy for premises leased after October 1, 1987. </p><p>It is a complex situation, to say the least. A fair solution to the larger issue of rented premises means more than an increase in rent. It depends on the Government's will to do something meaningful. So far, it has put up a weak defence in the Supreme Court, inviting allegations that it is pro-landlord. </p><p>"The will is missing because whatever it does, it can't endear itself to the landlords," says Murli Deora, MP, who used the rent issue in his election campaign. Now cornered, the Government wants to keep both tenants and landlords happy. That, everyone knows, is not easy.<br></p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Apr 13, 1998</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

states

States

<div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998April%2Fmaharashtra1_083012014418.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><p>Pushing 80, M.H. Prabhu pays roughly Rs 45 a month for his 600 sq ft tenement in Chikalwadi Blocks in south Mumbai. But he also coughs up 148 per cent property tax and nearly 10 per cent as other taxes for the same premises.</p><p> Add to that the varying amounts of repair cess, and the pensioner ends up paying Rs 200. Consider this too: in the early 1950s, when Prabhu first moved in, he made a down payment of Rs 570, a princely amount for someone earning Rs 12 a month. That pugree amount ensured for the landlord a return on investment.</p><p>Beginning this month, Prabhu will have to pay a higher rent. The question is how much more. Like him, there are nearly two million people in 19,642 buildings in Mumbai waiting for April 17 for the Supreme Court to decide on the issue. </p><p>Accordingly, they will either pay 5 per cent more for the following year with manifold increases after that. Or, in the worst-case scenario, pay 32 times the present amount, plus taxes. They may no longer be protected under the contentious Rent Act of 1947.</p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1998April%2Fmaharashtra2_083012014418.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div>CORNERED: The Government is expected to rationalise rent and provide affordable accommodation for chawl tenants but leaders like Murli Deora say the will is missing.</div></p><p>No wonder then that nearly 700 meetings of tenants from various areas have been held in the past 10 weeks. A recent rally at Azad Maidan had about one lakh tenants putting up a spirited fight for a fair deal. "Yes, it's a flashpoint," says state Housing Minister Sureshdada Jain. "We are trying to avoid an uprising."</p><p>The efforts notwithstanding, the Shiv Sena-BJP Government seems to have only added fuel to the fire. It was common knowledge that the Rent Act, after 20 extensions over the years, would expire on March 31, 1998. </p><div class="itemcenter"><iframe scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="62" awidth="320" aheight="62" amplayout="fixed" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Findiatoday%2Fbanner%2Fpreferred-source-new.html%3Fv%3D1.014" class="preferred-source-banner" loading="lazy"></iframe></div><style>.preferred-source-banner{  margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom:10px;}</style></p><p>The state Government was expected to rationalise the rental market, protect the small chawl tenants and bring the entire state under one law instead of the three different Acts that exist now. Rationalisation would mean fixing responsibilities for landlords and tenants, deciding on tenancy for legal heirs, providing for repairs of rented premises besides, of course, increasing rent.</p><p>As the national debate on the Model Rent Control Bill of 1992 raged, the Maharashtra Assembly was already considering a more comprehensive bill moved by the Sharad Pawar government in 1993 to replace the Rent Act. </p><p>The bill was subsequently referred to a joint select committee of the state legislature. But the committee has just met four times in the tenure of the present Government. "It's a case of the Government dragging its feet," charges Opposition leader Chhagan Bhujbal. "If it wanted, it could have brought in the new Act earlier and we wouldn't have had any of the present problems."</p><p>Landlords were pressing for rent decontrol; tenants wanted protection. Putting the issue on the backburner was easy for the alliance Government, bogged down as it was by internal contradictions. However, it's exacting a heavy price now. A spate of cases that began in 1986-87 in the Mumbai High Court ended up in the Supreme Court last year. </p><p>The December 19, 1997, judgement now under review with the final order expected on April 17 put the Government in a tight spot. It ordered a "fair and reasonable" increase in rents and left the Government with little option but to adopt the Model Rent Control Act. </p><p>The Government hurriedly effected the 5 per cent increase for premises leased before October 1, 1987 the cut-off date when rents were decontrolled for new buildings and leases by an amendment and extended the life of the Rent Act by a year.</p><table style="margin-right: 8px; background-color: rgb(229, 229, 229);" align="left" border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" height="65" width="200"><tbody><tr style="" dir="" id="" align="" background="" bgcolor="" height="" lang="" valign="top" xml:lang=""><td style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);"><b>In the worst-case scenario rents may go up 32 times, plus taxes.</b></td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>The move has opened a can of worms. "Why only 5 per cent, why not 2 per cent or 20 per cent?" asks landlord S. Saboonchi. Associations of landlords and property owners are gearing up to challenge the increase in the apex court. </p><p>More important, the larger issue of rented premises has been narrowed down to a problem of rent increase. Says Chandrashekhar Prabhu, urban planner: "It's unrealistic to focus only on rent increase. You have to look at the total of pugree, taxes and rent."<br><br>Though archaic, the Rent Act is rooted in the peculiar conditions that prevail in Mumbai. In the past, affordable rents and tenant protection were necessary to attract the middle and working classes, who formed the backbone of the metro's economy. To move into any rental premises today, a tenant under the pugree system must pay the existing market rate in that area, usually an amount equal to what he would pay to buy it. </p><p>Between 30 per cent and 40 per cent of the pugree goes to the landlord and the rest to the old tenant. This apart from the rent that he will pay every month. With a large majority of tenements changing hands regularly, the landlord makes substantial gains each time a new tenant walks in.</p><p> Far from providing affordable accommodation, rents are now considered a return on investments. "Landlords have received huge returns considering they didn't pay to buy the land," says Anil Goenka, convener of the Federation of Tenants Associations.<br><br>An equally significant issue is the dismal state of old buildings. Landlords, under the pretext of insufficient revenue, refuse to maintain and repair their premises. As a result, hundreds of buildings are on the verge of collapse. </p><p>To get around this problem, the Government set up the Repairs Board and began to charge a repair cess from tenants. Landlords are also free to demand what they fancy for premises leased after October 1, 1987. </p><p>It is a complex situation, to say the least. A fair solution to the larger issue of rented premises means more than an increase in rent. It depends on the Government's will to do something meaningful. So far, it has put up a weak defence in the Supreme Court, inviting allegations that it is pro-landlord. </p><p>"The will is missing because whatever it does, it can't endear itself to the landlords," says Murli Deora, MP, who used the rent issue in his election campaign. Now cornered, the Government wants to keep both tenants and landlords happy. That, everyone knows, is not easy.<br></p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Apr 13, 1998</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

<p>With higher rents in the offing, Mumbai's tenants are a harried lot. Having dragged its feet over the issue, the Government gropes for a viable solution.</p>

India Today

With higher rents in the offing, Mumbai's tenants are a harried lot. Having dragged its feet over the issue, the Government gropes for a viable solution.

In a tight spot - India Today

With higher rents in the offing, Mumbai's tenants a harried lot

In a tight spot

No country in position to secure Greenland except US: Trump at Davos

Screenshot%202026-01-21%20193214.png?VersionId=kyTZK9PSe387jk

Senior Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday met Indian men's cricket team head coach Gautam Gambhir, hailing him as "the man with the hardest job in India after the Prime Minister."

Shashi Tharoor meets Gautam Gambhir, says India coach has hardest job after PM Modi

Shashi Tharoor meets Gambhir, says India coach has hardest job after PM Modi

An intense western disturbance will bring widespread rain and snow to parts of north India on Thursday, January 22. Minimum temperatures are expected to rise by two to four degrees Celsius across the plains.

An intense western disturbance is set to bring widespread rain and snow to north India on Thursday, January 22. The IMD predicts a rise in minimum temperatures by two to four degrees Celsius, providing some relief from the cold wave. (Photo: PTI)

Rain Delhi

Rain and rising temperatures to hit parts of north India on Thursday

I am reviving Venezuela's economy, says Trump in Davos after taking over the country

Screenshot%202026-01-21%20191232

Day 5 of the Australian Open 2026 features Novak Djokovic, Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek headlining a blockbuster schedule as they aim to book their spots in the third round across Melbourne Park.

Novak Djokovic, Iga Swiatek

Day 5 Order of Play: Djokovic, Sinner, Swiatek aim for Round 3 berths

Play Time!

Donald Trump

Davos 2026

PM Modi

India vs New Zealand Live

T20 World Cup

Deepinder Goyal

Border 2

Dhurandhar

Virat Kohli

JEE Main

Maneka Gandhi

Jana Nayagan

Jaipur Literature Festival

WPL 2026

AR Rahman

Budget

In this Special Report, we focus on the retirement of veteran NASA astronaut Sunita Williams after an illustrious 27-year career. Speaking in New Delhi, Williams described her visit to India as a 'homecoming', reflecting on her deep personal ties to the country where her father was born. During an interactive session, she shared profound life lessons from her time aboard the International Space Station, noting, 'Every person I know is there. Every animal, every plant, everything we know is there, and we're all on this one planet.' Williams, who completed three missions and set multiple human spaceflight records, emphasized how viewing Earth from orbit changes one's perception of global differences. The retired astronaut also met with the family of late fellow astronaut Kalpana Chawla during her stay in the national capital. The programme highlights her historic contributions to space exploration and her reflections on humanity's shared home.

Sunita Williams: Being In India Is Homecoming

Sunita Williams retires from Nasa after 27 years, calls India visit a 'homecoming'

This report highlights a major embarrassment for Pakistan's Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, who inaugurated an unauthorised Pizza Hut outlet in his constituency of Sialkot.

Khwaja Asif Inaugurates Fake Pizza Hut

Khawaja Asif faces ridicule after inaugurating fake Pizza Hut outlet in Sialkot

In this India Today special report, anchor Aishwarya and correspondent Pranay Upadhyay discuss a security scare involving Donald Trump’s aircraft. Air Force One was forced to return to Joint Base Andrews shortly after take-off due to a technical snag in the electrical unit. Pranay Upadhyay noted, 'The security team of President Donald Trump did not want to take any chance with the President's aircraft,' leading to the decision to switch planes. Trump, who was en route to Davos, Switzerland, had to board a backup aircraft to continue his journey. The report highlights that the current VC-25A Boeing 747-200B has been in service since 1990 and is approximately 35 years old. While the aircraft is heavily modified and maintained, a new replacement is not expected until 2027. The return was described as a precautionary measure following the discovery of the minor electrical fault by the crew.

Donald Trumps Air Force One Scare: Technical Snag Forces Return

Donald Trump's Air Force One forced to return to base after technical snag

In this Special Report, the focus is on the crash of an Indian Air Force (IAF) microlight aircraft in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. The aircraft was on a routine training sortie when it crash-landed in a local pond. Reporter Shivani Sharma confirms that 'both the pilots are safe, they've been recovered' and are currently out of danger. Images from the site show the wreckage of the aircraft submerged in the water body. While the exact cause of the incident remains unclear, a court of inquiry has been ordered to investigate potential technical malfunctions or other circumstances leading to the crash. The aircraft, typically used for training and surveillance, was performing a standard exercise at the time of the accident. Authorities have secured the area as the investigation begins to determine the sequence of events that led to the emergency landing.

IAF microlight aircraft crashes in Prayagraj, both pilots safe

In an exclusive interview with India Today’s Bhavna Agarwal, actor Sophie Turner was joined by her co-star Archie Madekwe, who spoke about their love for India, RRR and more. 

Sophie Turner India Today Exclusive on India, RRR, Steal. Credit: Prime Video

Download App

Subscribe to India Today Print + Digital. Your First Month Is On Us. ₹299/month thereafter. Cancel anytime.

With higher rents in the offing, Mumbai's tenants a harried lot

With higher rents in the offing, Mumbai's tenants are a harried lot. Having dragged its feet over the issue, the Government gropes for a viable solution.

PUBLICATIONS

TELEVISION

EVENTS

RADIO

GAMING

USEFUL LINKS

PRINTING

WELFARE

DISTRIBUTION

SYNDICATIONS

WEBSITES

EDUCATION