Butchers of Sopore and Birmingham

Nine years of calm before icy storm

Kashmir turns crimson with blood of Pandits

AN UN-ISLAMIC KIDNAPPING AND CHAOS IN THE VALLEY

The illusion of azaadi and Kashmir’s historic deception

How Pak's terror policy evolved in Kashmir

Birth of social media jihadists, death of Article-370

Operation Sindoor: When Indian missiles rained on Pak terror parade

<div class='ite_mg_banner ads__container'><div class='it_mg_bnrBox'><div class='ite_bnr_cont'><div class='ite_cont_dtl'> <h4>Subscribe to India Today Print + Digital. Your First Month Is On Us. <span class='bold_text'> ₹299/month</span> thereafter. Cancel anytime.</h4><a href='https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsubscriptions.intoday.in%2Findiatoday%3Futm_source%3Dtop-web-banner ' class='ite_subscribe_btn origin_conscent_url' target='_blank'>SUBSCRIBE</a></div></div></div></div>

US Election coverage

India

World

NewsMo

Fact Check

Programmes

Match Schedule

Teams

Player Stats

Match Report

LIVE SCORES

<div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1976MAY%2Fkiss_040615094331.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img>'Nishant' - presentable tactics<p>With the Sholays, the<i>Dus Numberis</i>,<i>Nehle Pe Dehlas</i>and other "action-oriented" films monopolizing the scene, it is little wonder that the government has threatened to impose a ban on the portrayal of violence. A hero single-handedly beating up 30 villains a la James Bond may be a fantastic proposition but it romanticizes strong-arm tactics sufficiently to send shivers down the corridors of the Home Ministry.</p><p>The fear is that seeing injustice being repelled with the same brutality by which it is inflicted may make violence an acceptable norm of life. Imagine if the Harijans were to beat up the caste Hindus who refuse them water from the village well! It would be a blot upon our hallowed law and order system and lead to anarchy.</p><p>Far better is the nonviolent way. The Harijans could complain to the police (consisting doubtless of further caste Hindus!) and await justice on the plea that the law accords them equal rights. And they may get it too, if they have the patience to wait for it. It is another matter if they die of thirst in the meantime.</p><p>The quarrel with the government on the issue of violence in the cinema emanates not from the ends they have in view but from the means by which they expect to achieve them. For, like most bureaucratic ideas, this one too is based upon a superficial observation of facts.</p><p>The logic runs approximately along the following lines: We are a peace-loving people. Tolerance is our heritage, non-violence our creed. Films are having an adverse effect on us and particularly on our youth. If we do away with violence in the cinema, we will arrest the trend towards it in real life.</p><div class="itemcenter"><amp-iframe height="62" title="" width="320" sandbox="allow-forms allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-top-navigation allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation" allowfullscreen src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Findiatoday%2Fbanner%2Fpreferred-source-new.html%3Fv%3D1.014%5Cu0026native%3D1" class="mrBt15 preferred-source-banner"> </amp-iframe></div></p><p>The argument is unobjectionable but only partially true. For, as the film industry rightly observes, violence was not invented by the cinema. "Were there no wars, no riots, no revolutions before the 20th century?" they ask. "Were arson, rape, murder, theft, gangsterism unknown before they appeared on films? How is it that at a time when the Indian cinema had not even discovered violence, this non-violent nation shot Mahatma Gandhi dead?" These questions are worth going into even if one rejects the obviously absurd claim of the industry that "violence at a fantastic level has no adverse repercussions on society."</p><p>Where the government and indeed we, as a people, go wrong is in the assumption that India is a non-violent nation. We fancy the idea, to be sure, but in fact we are as far removed from it as any other people in the world. To substantiate this in any detail would be to overstep the limits of this column. Suffice it therefore to say that the myth of non-violence emerges from a misinterpretation of three major facts of history.</p><p>Firstly, we did not fight off the various invaders who swooped down upon India over the centuries. This resulted from weakness, the absence of a concept of nationhood, and above all a philosophical system that glorifies the idea of individual salvation (thereby inadvertently causing one to reject the merit of collective action), rather than from a positive preference for non-violence.</p><p>Secondly, we produced men of the disposition of Gautama Buddha, Mahavira and Mahatma Gandhi, all of whom stood for the concept of non-violence. But here again we tend to overlook the fact that they were reformers whose creed could only have grown out of a necessity to react against a violent reality. Thirdly, we never subscribed to the idea of religious proselytization.</p><p>In a world which saw Muslims and Christians spreading their religion at the point of the bayonet, this emerges as the greatest single proof of Hindu nonviolence. Examined closely, however, the picture is not quite as rosy as it seems. Hinduism does not seek converts because anyone born outside it is a <i>mlecha</i> who can never be redeemed.</p><p>No swords are unsheathed, but the contempt of the Hindu towards his supposedly less fortunate neighbour is a form of violence far more devastating than any act of physical aggression. Nor is this contempt directed solely at the non-Hindu. The caste system and its variations have institutionalized the grossest moral violence.</p><p>Added to this is the violence generated by the inequities of our present pattern of life. In a society committed to industrialization and change, it is natural for people to initially suffer from a lack of harmony with the outside world. Alienated from nature, from traditional environments, ancestral occupations and age-old family relationships.</p><p>We are increasingly joining the ranks of what Romantic literature has aptly described as "the insulted and the injured." We are caught up in the iron contradictions of modern life and find it difficult to strike a balance between the impulses of our will and the aims we feel we ought to achieve.</p><p>One major result of this has been a desire to escape from reality - a desire that clearly explains the success of the commercial film. But the very fact that the flight from unsatisfying jobs, cumbersome obligations and uncomfortable ideologies has of late favoured a celluloid world of intoxicating action, brutal sensationalism and barbaric fights, points to the existence of a violence simmering beneath the placid exterior of a people eulogized for their tolerance. Indeed, the time may not be far when our tradition of moral oppression will be replaced by an orgy of physical violence.</p><p>To an extent, it is clear that the vicarious pleasure derived from violence in the cinema acts as a safety valve for pent emotions and the rising anger against a harsh reality. This is the argument offered by some members of the industry who are anxious to go on churning out their cop and robber films. But the government, motivated by a concern larger than that of making a quick buck, rightly foresees a stage when violence will generate violence.</p><p>While this explains the sudden desire to ban the portrayal of violence in the cinema, it does no particular credit to the mind of the government. For, by ignoring the fact that, like other human beings, we too are prone to violence in a social situation similar to the one prevailing in India today, the government is being as escapist as our irrational audiences. </p><p>What is required is not a <i>flight from</i> but an <i>encounter with </i>reality. There is no need to ban violence in the cinema. On the contrary, there is a need to encourage its portrayal with the injunction that it must be shown in realistic terms as an undesirable way of life.</p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Apr 6, 2015</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

society-and-the-arts

Society & The Arts

films

Films

<div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1976MAY%2Fkiss_040615094331.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div>'Nishant' - presentable tactics<p>With the Sholays, the<i>Dus Numberis</i>,<i>Nehle Pe Dehlas</i>and other "action-oriented" films monopolizing the scene, it is little wonder that the government has threatened to impose a ban on the portrayal of violence. A hero single-handedly beating up 30 villains a la James Bond may be a fantastic proposition but it romanticizes strong-arm tactics sufficiently to send shivers down the corridors of the Home Ministry.</p><p>The fear is that seeing injustice being repelled with the same brutality by which it is inflicted may make violence an acceptable norm of life. Imagine if the Harijans were to beat up the caste Hindus who refuse them water from the village well! It would be a blot upon our hallowed law and order system and lead to anarchy.</p><p>Far better is the nonviolent way. The Harijans could complain to the police (consisting doubtless of further caste Hindus!) and await justice on the plea that the law accords them equal rights. And they may get it too, if they have the patience to wait for it. It is another matter if they die of thirst in the meantime.</p><p>The quarrel with the government on the issue of violence in the cinema emanates not from the ends they have in view but from the means by which they expect to achieve them. For, like most bureaucratic ideas, this one too is based upon a superficial observation of facts.</p><p>The logic runs approximately along the following lines: We are a peace-loving people. Tolerance is our heritage, non-violence our creed. Films are having an adverse effect on us and particularly on our youth. If we do away with violence in the cinema, we will arrest the trend towards it in real life.</p><div class="itemcenter"><iframe scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="62" awidth="320" aheight="62" amplayout="fixed" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Findiatoday%2Fbanner%2Fpreferred-source-new.html%3Fv%3D1.014" class="preferred-source-banner" loading="lazy"></iframe></div><style>.preferred-source-banner{  margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom:10px;}</style></p><p>The argument is unobjectionable but only partially true. For, as the film industry rightly observes, violence was not invented by the cinema. "Were there no wars, no riots, no revolutions before the 20th century?" they ask. "Were arson, rape, murder, theft, gangsterism unknown before they appeared on films? How is it that at a time when the Indian cinema had not even discovered violence, this non-violent nation shot Mahatma Gandhi dead?" These questions are worth going into even if one rejects the obviously absurd claim of the industry that "violence at a fantastic level has no adverse repercussions on society."</p><p>Where the government and indeed we, as a people, go wrong is in the assumption that India is a non-violent nation. We fancy the idea, to be sure, but in fact we are as far removed from it as any other people in the world. To substantiate this in any detail would be to overstep the limits of this column. Suffice it therefore to say that the myth of non-violence emerges from a misinterpretation of three major facts of history.</p><p>Firstly, we did not fight off the various invaders who swooped down upon India over the centuries. This resulted from weakness, the absence of a concept of nationhood, and above all a philosophical system that glorifies the idea of individual salvation (thereby inadvertently causing one to reject the merit of collective action), rather than from a positive preference for non-violence.</p><p>Secondly, we produced men of the disposition of Gautama Buddha, Mahavira and Mahatma Gandhi, all of whom stood for the concept of non-violence. But here again we tend to overlook the fact that they were reformers whose creed could only have grown out of a necessity to react against a violent reality. Thirdly, we never subscribed to the idea of religious proselytization.</p><p>In a world which saw Muslims and Christians spreading their religion at the point of the bayonet, this emerges as the greatest single proof of Hindu nonviolence. Examined closely, however, the picture is not quite as rosy as it seems. Hinduism does not seek converts because anyone born outside it is a <i>mlecha</i> who can never be redeemed.</p><p>No swords are unsheathed, but the contempt of the Hindu towards his supposedly less fortunate neighbour is a form of violence far more devastating than any act of physical aggression. Nor is this contempt directed solely at the non-Hindu. The caste system and its variations have institutionalized the grossest moral violence.</p><p>Added to this is the violence generated by the inequities of our present pattern of life. In a society committed to industrialization and change, it is natural for people to initially suffer from a lack of harmony with the outside world. Alienated from nature, from traditional environments, ancestral occupations and age-old family relationships.</p><p>We are increasingly joining the ranks of what Romantic literature has aptly described as "the insulted and the injured." We are caught up in the iron contradictions of modern life and find it difficult to strike a balance between the impulses of our will and the aims we feel we ought to achieve.</p><p>One major result of this has been a desire to escape from reality - a desire that clearly explains the success of the commercial film. But the very fact that the flight from unsatisfying jobs, cumbersome obligations and uncomfortable ideologies has of late favoured a celluloid world of intoxicating action, brutal sensationalism and barbaric fights, points to the existence of a violence simmering beneath the placid exterior of a people eulogized for their tolerance. Indeed, the time may not be far when our tradition of moral oppression will be replaced by an orgy of physical violence.</p><p>To an extent, it is clear that the vicarious pleasure derived from violence in the cinema acts as a safety valve for pent emotions and the rising anger against a harsh reality. This is the argument offered by some members of the industry who are anxious to go on churning out their cop and robber films. But the government, motivated by a concern larger than that of making a quick buck, rightly foresees a stage when violence will generate violence.</p><p>While this explains the sudden desire to ban the portrayal of violence in the cinema, it does no particular credit to the mind of the government. For, by ignoring the fact that, like other human beings, we too are prone to violence in a social situation similar to the one prevailing in India today, the government is being as escapist as our irrational audiences. </p><p>What is required is not a <i>flight from</i> but an <i>encounter with </i>reality. There is no need to ban violence in the cinema. On the contrary, there is a need to encourage its portrayal with the injunction that it must be shown in realistic terms as an undesirable way of life.</p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Apr 6, 2015</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

With the Sholays, the&nbsp;<i>Dus Numberis</i>,&nbsp;<i>Nehle Pe Dehlas</i>&nbsp;and other "action-oriented" films monopolizing the scene, it is little wonder that the government has threatened to impose a ban on the portrayal of violence.

India Today

With the Sholays, the Dus Numberis, Nehle Pe Dehlas and other "action-oriented" films monopolizing the scene, it is little wonder that the government has threatened to impose a ban on the portrayal of violence.

Kiss kiss, bang bang - India Today

Government threatens to impose ban on portrayal of violence in films

Kiss kiss, bang bang

Indian healthcare professionals are changing how they approach overseas jobs, prioritising stability, transparency and long-term growth over quick relocation. The shift marks a move from urgency-led decisions to carefully planned global careers.


Are Indian healthcare professionals becoming more selective about working abroad?

Why are Indian healthcare professionals less interested in working abroad today?

Indian cities such as Chennai, Bengaluru, and parts of the National Capital Region (NCR) have already seen similar crises, driven by groundwater depletion, erratic rainfall and rising demand.

Bengaluru water crisis: Societies put blanket ban on certain activities 

What UN's warning on water scarcity means for India as demand outpaces supply

Taps running dry: What UN warning on water scarcity means for India

Will end Hamas if they don't give up weapons: Trump holds signing ceremony of Gaza Board of Peace in Davos

2026-01-22T102941Z_1799725447_RC2A6JAY7A7T_RTRMADP_3_DAVOS-MEETING.JPG?VersionId=y5t6pf02dV

If someone suddenly starts laughing or crying during an orgasm, it's natural to feel concerned. But these reactions are actually quite common.

Many people experience overwhelming emotional responses during orgasm | Photo: Getty Images

Do you laugh or cry while climaxing? Know all about peri-orgasmic phenomena

IAS officer Sanjeev Khirwar, who was transferred to Ladakh after a dog-walking controversy, is back in the capital as MCD Commissioner. One of the key tasks that the dog-stroller babu will get is to deal with Delhi's street-dog problem. This could be a template for bureaucrats with special talents.

A dog-loving bureaucrat has returned to Delhi, where street dogs have spelled serous troubles. (Image for representation: Author/India Today)

Dog-walker IAS officer returns to Delhi. Is it a stray coincidence?

Play Time!

Donald Trump

Davos 2026

Border 2

JEE Main

PM Modi

T20 World Cup

Dhurandhar

Virat Kohli

Jana Nayagan

Jaipur Literature Festival

WPL 2026

AR Rahman

Budget

United States President Donald Trump, who addressed the World Economic Forum in Davos, said that he loves Europe, but it's not heading in the right direction.

I love Europe, but it's not heading in right direction: Trump at Davos

Gita Gopinath, Indian-American economist and Professor of Economics at Harvard University, shares her insights on Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's remarks on shifting global economic order during the World Economic Forum in Davos and dealing with tariffs. 

Gita

Movie isn't over: Gita Gopinath on Trump tariffs and Carney's speech

At World Economic Forum (WEF) Roundtable in Davos, India Today Group Vice-Chairperson and Executive Editor-in-Chief Kalli Purie moderated a session on India's growth story.

round

WEF Roundtable: Can India become the third-largest economy? Experts weigh in

In this Special Report, we focus on the retirement of veteran NASA astronaut Sunita Williams after an illustrious 27-year career. Speaking in New Delhi, Williams described her visit to India as a 'homecoming', reflecting on her deep personal ties to the country where her father was born. During an interactive session, she shared profound life lessons from her time aboard the International Space Station, noting, 'Every person I know is there. Every animal, every plant, everything we know is there, and we're all on this one planet.' Williams, who completed three missions and set multiple human spaceflight records, emphasized how viewing Earth from orbit changes one's perception of global differences. The retired astronaut also met with the family of late fellow astronaut Kalpana Chawla during her stay in the national capital. The programme highlights her historic contributions to space exploration and her reflections on humanity's shared home.

Sunita Williams: Being In India Is Homecoming

Sunita Williams retires from Nasa after 27 years, calls India visit a 'homecoming'

This report highlights a major embarrassment for Pakistan's Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, who inaugurated an unauthorised Pizza Hut outlet in his constituency of Sialkot.

Download App

Subscribe to India Today Print + Digital. Your First Month Is On Us. ₹299/month thereafter. Cancel anytime.

Government threatens to impose ban on portrayal of violence in films

With the Sholays, the Dus Numberis, Nehle Pe Dehlas and other "action-oriented" films monopolizing the scene, it is little wonder that the government has threatened to impose a ban on the portrayal of violence.

PUBLICATIONS

TELEVISION

EVENTS

RADIO

GAMING

USEFUL LINKS

PRINTING

WELFARE

DISTRIBUTION

SYNDICATIONS

WEBSITES

EDUCATION