Salman RushdieNow that the Iranian Government has pledged not to despatch a death squad to implement the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, things are apparently looking up for the 51-year-old author ofSatanic Verses.But he is bitter about India, from which he remains, in effect, banned. "The response of the Indian government through the past 10 years has been very distressing," rages Rushdie, "It was the first country to ban the book and that was done before it was even published there." For the Mumbai-born writer, it is this enforced exile that has been the greatest loss. India has provided the inspiration for much of his work, including Midnight's Children, his biggest book.For some three years, Iran had been indicating Rushdie was safe and there was no question of offering a reward for his murder. However, no written guarantee was forthcoming. To issue one would be to overturn the late Ayatollah Khomeini's edict. As a senior Iranian diplomat in London put it, "Nobody can touch the theoretical aspect of the fatwa unless he wants to commit suicide." In effect, nobody can overrule Khomeini except Khomeini himself - and he's dead..preferred-source-banner{ margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom:10px;}The new situation has arisen because the Iranian Government has said, somewhat contradictorily, that while the fatwa will always retain its religious validity, it will not be carried out - at least not by Iran. Driven by economic compulsions, London immediately restored full diplomatic relations with Tehran.The Satanic Verses saga began in India. Penguin India was going to publish it ahead of Viking in London but pulled out when the manuscript arrived. When London went ahead with publication on September 26, 1988, Rajiv Gandhi, then prime minister, banned any import. A copy was ceremonially burnt in Bradford on January 16, 1989. Photocopies of the offending pages were circulated among British Muslim leaders, one of whom, the late Kalim Siddiqui, had close links with Iran.Siddiqui was in Tehran when Khomeini, having seen TV footage of anti-Satanic Verses riots in Pakistan, demanded information about the author. "Oh Rushdie? Very bad man," was what the Indian-born Siddiqui told a Khomeini aide. The ayatollah's response was the death sentence of February 14, 1989.With the fatwa that had "deformed" his life seemingly defanged, Rushdie exuded relief: "It's a great day and we should recognise it as such." He flared up when asked if he would apologise for the offence caused by Satanic Verses. "There is not a chance in hell that the book will be withdrawn," he thundered. Stung by his words, clerics and the foreign ministry spokesman in Iran reaffirmed the validity of the fatwa. This confusion ensures that while Rushdie's security - estimated budget: a million pounds a year - may be scaled down, it will not be disbanded.In fact, there is reason to believe that Rushdie's threat perception remains unchanged. While the Iranian Government may have wriggled out of a tight spot, it has no control over private groups. One such Islamic fundamentalist body, the Khordad Foundation, has offered a $2.5 million (Rs 10.5 crore) bounty to anyone who kills Rushdie. The offer stands unrevoked.So what has been achieved? Nothing more than the exchange of full-fledged embassies between London and Tehran. For Rushdie, there is the anomalous situation of Robin Cook - the British foreign secretary who was seen as rushing into a detente with Iran - claiming that the threat had been "very substantially diminshed" and yet affirming that security arrangements would continue.In sum, while Rushdie's prime foe, the Government of Iran, may have backtracked, he is not quite a free man. The threat of a crazed assassin's bullet remains. The word magician will have to keep looking over his shoulder.Published By: AtMigration Published On: Oct 12, 1998--- ENDS ---