Butchers of Sopore and Birmingham

Nine years of calm before icy storm

Kashmir turns crimson with blood of Pandits

AN UN-ISLAMIC KIDNAPPING AND CHAOS IN THE VALLEY

The illusion of azaadi and Kashmir’s historic deception

How Pak's terror policy evolved in Kashmir

Birth of social media jihadists, death of Article-370

Operation Sindoor: When Indian missiles rained on Pak terror parade

<div class='ite_mg_banner ads__container'><div class='it_mg_bnrBox'><div class='ite_bnr_cont'><div class='ite_cont_dtl'> <h4>Subscribe to India Today Print + Digital. Your First Month Is On Us. <span class='bold_text'> ₹299/month</span> thereafter. Cancel anytime.</h4><a href='https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsubscriptions.intoday.in%2Findiatoday%3Futm_source%3Dtop-web-banner ' class='ite_subscribe_btn origin_conscent_url' target='_blank'>SUBSCRIBE</a></div></div></div></div>

US Election coverage

India

World

NewsMo

Fact Check

Programmes

Match Schedule

Teams

Player Stats

Match Report

LIVE SCORES

<div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-1_small_112812122749.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div><p>A sense of scandal surrounds any discussion on the social basis of voting in India. A mix of embarrassment and guilt creates a breeding ground for the myths which dominate political analysis.</p><p>A sample: castes serve as vote banks for political parties; elections are all about caste/community equations; neither issues nor ideologies matter to the common people who simply go by what their caste and community leaders tell them.<br><br>Square this with the findings of the ICSSR-INDIA TODAY-CSDS survey of the Indian electorate, the largest and most authentic of its kind undertaken after the 1996 elections. When asked about the person they had consulted before voting, less than 3 per cent mentioned caste/community leaders. To a different question, "Do you think it is important to vote the way your caste/community does?" a majority replied in the negative. </p><p>This is a striking reversal of the answer to the same question in 1971. Similarly, the proportion of voters who believe that their caste/community votes for different parties rather than only one party has more than doubled in the past 25 years. Only one-sixth of them think that there is any political party that looks specially after the interests of their caste/community.<br><br>Are they lying? Or trying to sound politically correct, like their leaders? Or is the modern Indian nation finally beginning to get rid of the ghost of caste? Will citizens vote on the basis of the merits of the candidates and the policies of the parties rather than caste? <br><br>Neither of these appears to be the case. The fact of the matter is that there is no democracy in the world where circumstances of one's birth do not influence the voting decision. Caste itself is a shorthand for all sorts of 'secular' social indicators like social status, educational level, or occupation. These factors are bound to influence the political judgement of any voter. In India, as elsewhere, the voters' perception of issues and ideologies is itself heavily conditioned by their location in society. The notion of democracy would mean one thing to the <i>bhadralok</i> in Calcutta, and quite another to an Adivasi in Midnapore.<br><br>It is not simply that caste influences politics. In India the role played by politics in determining the shape and boundaries of caste is no less significant. Caste groupings invented for the purpose of manufacturing electoral majorities. As Professor Rajni Kothari pointed out two decades ago, more than casteism in politics we have politicisation of caste.<br><br>Caste polarisation is never so total, exclusive and frozen as it is made out to be. Class interests and personal opinion routinely lead large numbers to vote against the party whose vote bank they are believed to be. People may actually go out and vote against the candidate of their caste, and instead choose a candidate belonging to a party seen to be closer to their caste. There is a lot more to "caste voting" than meets the eye.</p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-2_small_112812122749.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>CONGRESS is no longer a rainbow</b><br></p><p>Conventional wisdom views Congress as a rainbow coalition 
of communities. All colours and shades represented more or less evenly, 
covering the whole spectrum of Indian society. Even after the decline in
 the 1996 election, the Congress voters are spread evenly across the 
social divides.</p><p> The party has also retained its class profile; it
 remains more popular among the poor, without losing its support in the 
rest of the population.<br><br>But this all-India picture hides a more 
complex pattern, with Congress drawing on the support of different caste
 groups in different areas of the country. An analysis by Professor 
Anthony Heath of Oxford University has highlighted the lack of a solid 
support base for Congress throughout Indian society. </p><p>The
 shape of the Congress support in different regions is largely 
determined by the nature of the regional competition it faces. If we go 
region-wise, the Congress resembles a cushion which takes the shape of 
the person who last sat on it.</p><p>The lack of any real backbone of support leaves it open to attack from all sides.<br><br>When
 challenged by the BJP in the north and the west, it is robbed of the 
upper caste, and some of the landed peasant castes, and appears a party 
of the underprivileged. When the main competition comes from the Left 
Front (LF) the Congress loses out on the poor and the Dalits, and 
becomes a party of the privileged.</p><p> Faced by regional parties 
drawing on support from OBCs, the Congress is left thin in the middle. 
When challenged from all three sides, the case in Uttar Pradesh and 
Bihar, it looses the support of every social group; all the stuffing is 
knocked out of the cushion. Congress is no one's party, struggling for 
survival. In a majority of states, it is no longer the rainbow it used 
to be.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-4_small_112812014450.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>BJP still has a narrow social base</b><br></p><p>For long derided as the Brahmin-Bania party of the urban 
areas, the BJP has come a long way in expanding its social base. Be it 
the Jats of Western Uttar Pradesh and Haryana, Sikhs in Delhi, or the 
Patidars in Gujarat, the BJP's influence goes beyond the top three 
varnas. Yet it still carries a lot of its old features: virtually no 
Muslim vote, very strong among the upper castes and weak among the 
Dalits.</p><p> It has some appeal among the Adivasis, but only in a few 
pockets. It may have won more seats than the Congress, but in terms of 
the social base it is a much narrower party.<br></p><table><tbody><tr><td><b> Where the BJP stands ...</b></td></tr><tr><td><b>  ... in old areas</b></td><td> <b> ... in new areas</b></td></tr><tr><td> Upper Caste</td><td> <b>58</b></td><td>  Upper Caste</td><td><b>38</b> <br></td></tr><tr><td> OBC</td><td> 39</td><td> OBC</td><td> 26</td></tr><tr><td> SC</td><td> 18</td><td> SC</td><td> 16</td></tr><tr><td> ST</td><td> 25</td><td> ST</td><td> 24</td></tr><tr><td> Muslim</td><td> 4</td><td> Muslim</td><td> 2</td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>The
 narrow caste base is reinforced by an even narrower class base. There 
is a straight correlation: the poorer you are, the less likely you are 
to vote for the BJP. Urbanity, ritual hierarchy, education, respectable 
occupations and wealth are all associated with a greater propensity to 
vote for the BJP. Class and caste reinforce each other: if you are well 
off and educated you are more likely to vote BJP, but if you are from an
 upper caste group as well, the chances are even higher. </p><p>The 
BJP's social base reflects all the signs of a party of the privileged. 
This makes the Indian upper class one of the safest vote banks of all. 
Comparing the caste composition of the BJP vote in the traditional old 
areas of the Jana Sangh and those states in which the BJP has become a 
force in the past decade shows that in the new areas of conquest it has 
less of an upper caste bias.</p><p> Compulsions of building social 
alliances have forced it to bring other castes and communities into its 
fold. Take Gujarat, where the need to bring in OBCs has given it a 
broader support base on which to build. In the rest of the country, 
particularly the south, the BJP is struggling to develop a clear 
profile.<br><br>Can the BJP take advantage of its infancy in these areas
 and develop into a true mass party? Or will it be unable to break free 
of the weight of its own history?<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-3_small_112812122749.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>UF combines different social profiles</b><br></p><p>Like the congress, the national picture of the United Front
 (minus the LF) support is a very artificial indicator of its social 
base. It includes different parties with different social profiles.There
 are two main patterns in the data from the 1996 election.</p><p>In 
states like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Assam they garner support from
 a broad swathe of society. In these states the UF partners campaign on a
 mainly regional programme which cuts across caste-community lines.<br></p><p>In
 Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, the UF is identified not with a regional but a
 social justice plank. Here the Samajwadi Party (SP)Janata Dal (JD) 
votes contain a very strong support from the OBCs and Muslims.<br></p><p>The
 appeal may not be only to caste, but it has a strong caste resonance. A
 discordant note is struck in Orissa, where the votes for Biju Patnaik's
 anti-Mandal JD largely came from the upper caste.<br><br>Yet these 
different streams can continue to coexist, for the regionalisation of 
Indian politics allows them to campaign on their own agendas in their 
own areas, whilst broad cooperation has few costs and can be mutually 
very rewarding.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-5_small_112812014451.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>LF is competing along class lines</b><br></p><p>The ideology of a party is often a poor guide to its social
 base. But in the case of the Left Front (LF) there is some 
correspondence between its theory of class mobilization and its support 
structure. In terms of caste, the LF votes are spread over all the caste
 groupings and communities, including the upper castes.</p><p>They get a
 surprisingly high level of support from the SCs and fairly high from 
the Muslims. But that is largely because the states where LF has its 
base have a higher proportion of Dalit and Muslim population.</p><p>A 
look at the class base shows a clear and consistent pattern. An 
overwhelming majority of its support comes from the poor and the very 
poor. Communism does not seem to be an urban middle class phenomenon in 
India.<br><br>In Kerala, Tripura and West Bengal, the LF has managed to 
keep the political agenda focussed on issues that play along class 
lines, and the voters have responded. Outside its strongholds the 
class-based approach has failed to attract votes for the LF. With 
strongly localised support and appeal across the castes the LF resembles
 the regional parties of the UF in terms of social base. Another awkward
 piece in the UF jigsaw.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-6_small_112812014451.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>BSP gets all its support from the weakest</b><br></p><p>Kanshi ram had made it clear his party had no room for the 
upper caste; expectedly, the BSP is solidly founded on Dalit support. 
This leaves it a small party, but one with a distinct and stable social 
profile; opposite that of the BJP.<br><br>The BSP has had some success 
in Uttar Pradesh in broadening its social support to the lower OBCs and 
the Muslims. This development was crucial to its ideology of a 'bahujan'
 mobilisation, since the category was always meant to include 
non-Dalits.</p><p> Outside Uttar Pradesh, the BSP has made little 
headway in gaining the confidence of any other section. It remains to be
 seen if it can retain the Muslim votes it secured in 1996 after 
entering into the infamous alliance with the BJP.<br><br>The BSP faces 
the dilemma of widening the support base with the consequent diluting of
 its identity as the party of a particular social group, or remaining a 
small but socially coherent party wielding influence only as long as it 
is in a pivotal position.<br><br>The real challenge for the party is to 
develop a 'bahujan' unity central to its ideology. The fate of its 
attempts to build a Dalit-Adivasi alliance in Madhya Pradesh will test 
it again this time.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><amp-img src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-7_small_112812014451.jpg" alt="" height="425" width="650" class="" layout="responsive"></amp-img><div class="clicktoenlarge"><a href="#" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>CLASS factor reinforces CASTE</b><br></p><p>The influence of economic groups is less visible than the social 
categories of caste and community. Yet the research on Indian elections 
shows that now the voter has a clear class profile. Whether the voter is
 rich or poor is about as important in his voting decision as is his 
caste or community. These are not two separate effects.</p><p> The class
 factor goes with the caste. Those who belong to 'lower' castes also 
tend to be poor, and the upper caste Hindus tend to be better off. 
What's more, the class profile of major parties is such that both the 
effects tend to operate in the same direction and reinforce each other. 
Congress gets more support from the poor than the rich, but the 
difference is not very stark. The slope for the UF is sharper. </p><p>Its
 vote share among the very poor is nearly twice that of its support 
among the rich. The LF depends mainly on the poor and the very poor for 
its votes. The BSP depends exclusively on these sections.The picture is 
neatly reversed in the case of the BJP.</p><p> Its class profile looks 
like an inverted pyramid. Its vote share among the economically most 
privileged is more than double as compared to those below the poverty 
line. Clearly, the BJP combines economic and social privileges.</p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Feb 2, 1998</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

nation

Nation

<div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-1_small_112812122749.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:78px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-1_large_112812122749.jpg','window','status=no,resize=yes,toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes,width=437,height=821'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div><p>A sense of scandal surrounds any discussion on the social basis of voting in India. A mix of embarrassment and guilt creates a breeding ground for the myths which dominate political analysis.</p><p>A sample: castes serve as vote banks for political parties; elections are all about caste/community equations; neither issues nor ideologies matter to the common people who simply go by what their caste and community leaders tell them.<br><br>Square this with the findings of the ICSSR-INDIA TODAY-CSDS survey of the Indian electorate, the largest and most authentic of its kind undertaken after the 1996 elections. When asked about the person they had consulted before voting, less than 3 per cent mentioned caste/community leaders. To a different question, "Do you think it is important to vote the way your caste/community does?" a majority replied in the negative. </p><p>This is a striking reversal of the answer to the same question in 1971. Similarly, the proportion of voters who believe that their caste/community votes for different parties rather than only one party has more than doubled in the past 25 years. Only one-sixth of them think that there is any political party that looks specially after the interests of their caste/community.<br><br>Are they lying? Or trying to sound politically correct, like their leaders? Or is the modern Indian nation finally beginning to get rid of the ghost of caste? Will citizens vote on the basis of the merits of the candidates and the policies of the parties rather than caste? <br><br>Neither of these appears to be the case. The fact of the matter is that there is no democracy in the world where circumstances of one's birth do not influence the voting decision. Caste itself is a shorthand for all sorts of 'secular' social indicators like social status, educational level, or occupation. These factors are bound to influence the political judgement of any voter. In India, as elsewhere, the voters' perception of issues and ideologies is itself heavily conditioned by their location in society. The notion of democracy would mean one thing to the <i>bhadralok</i> in Calcutta, and quite another to an Adivasi in Midnapore.<br><br>It is not simply that caste influences politics. In India the role played by politics in determining the shape and boundaries of caste is no less significant. Caste groupings invented for the purpose of manufacturing electoral majorities. As Professor Rajni Kothari pointed out two decades ago, more than casteism in politics we have politicisation of caste.<br><br>Caste polarisation is never so total, exclusive and frozen as it is made out to be. Class interests and personal opinion routinely lead large numbers to vote against the party whose vote bank they are believed to be. People may actually go out and vote against the candidate of their caste, and instead choose a candidate belonging to a party seen to be closer to their caste. There is a lot more to "caste voting" than meets the eye.</p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-2_small_112812122749.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:134px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-2_large_112812122749.jpg','window','status=no,resize=yes,toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes,width=738,height=821'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>CONGRESS is no longer a rainbow</b><br></p><p>Conventional wisdom views Congress as a rainbow coalition 
of communities. All colours and shades represented more or less evenly, 
covering the whole spectrum of Indian society. Even after the decline in
 the 1996 election, the Congress voters are spread evenly across the 
social divides.</p><p> The party has also retained its class profile; it
 remains more popular among the poor, without losing its support in the 
rest of the population.<br><br>But this all-India picture hides a more 
complex pattern, with Congress drawing on the support of different caste
 groups in different areas of the country. An analysis by Professor 
Anthony Heath of Oxford University has highlighted the lack of a solid 
support base for Congress throughout Indian society. </p><p>The
 shape of the Congress support in different regions is largely 
determined by the nature of the regional competition it faces. If we go 
region-wise, the Congress resembles a cushion which takes the shape of 
the person who last sat on it.</p><p>The lack of any real backbone of support leaves it open to attack from all sides.<br><br>When
 challenged by the BJP in the north and the west, it is robbed of the 
upper caste, and some of the landed peasant castes, and appears a party 
of the underprivileged. When the main competition comes from the Left 
Front (LF) the Congress loses out on the poor and the Dalits, and 
becomes a party of the privileged.</p><p> Faced by regional parties 
drawing on support from OBCs, the Congress is left thin in the middle. 
When challenged from all three sides, the case in Uttar Pradesh and 
Bihar, it looses the support of every social group; all the stuffing is 
knocked out of the cushion. Congress is no one's party, struggling for 
survival. In a majority of states, it is no longer the rainbow it used 
to be.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-4_small_112812014450.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:150px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-4_larg_112812014450.jpg','window','status=no,resize=no,toolbar=no,scrollbars=no,width=800,height=418'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>BJP still has a narrow social base</b><br></p><p>For long derided as the Brahmin-Bania party of the urban 
areas, the BJP has come a long way in expanding its social base. Be it 
the Jats of Western Uttar Pradesh and Haryana, Sikhs in Delhi, or the 
Patidars in Gujarat, the BJP's influence goes beyond the top three 
varnas. Yet it still carries a lot of its old features: virtually no 
Muslim vote, very strong among the upper castes and weak among the 
Dalits.</p><p> It has some appeal among the Adivasis, but only in a few 
pockets. It may have won more seats than the Congress, but in terms of 
the social base it is a much narrower party.<br></p><table style="margin-left: 8px; background-color: rgb(229, 229, 229); height: 192px;" align="right" border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" width="248"><tbody><tr style="" dir="" id="" align="center" background="" bgcolor="" height="" lang="" valign="top" xml:lang=""><td colspan="4" rowspan="1"><b> Where the BJP stands ...</b></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" rowspan="1"><b>  ... in old areas</b></td><td colspan="2" rowspan="1"> <b> ... in new areas</b></td></tr><tr style="" dir="" id="" align="" background="" bgcolor="" height="" lang="" valign="top" xml:lang=""><td colspan="1"> Upper Caste</td><td style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);" colspan="1"> <b>58</b></td><td rowspan="1">  Upper Caste</td><td style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);" colspan="1"><b>38</b> <br></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1"> OBC</td><td> 39</td><td rowspan="1"> OBC</td><td> 26</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1"> SC</td><td> 18</td><td rowspan="1"> SC</td><td> 16</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1"> ST</td><td> 25</td><td rowspan="1"> ST</td><td> 24</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1"> Muslim</td><td> 4</td><td rowspan="1"> Muslim</td><td> 2</td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>The
 narrow caste base is reinforced by an even narrower class base. There 
is a straight correlation: the poorer you are, the less likely you are 
to vote for the BJP. Urbanity, ritual hierarchy, education, respectable 
occupations and wealth are all associated with a greater propensity to 
vote for the BJP. Class and caste reinforce each other: if you are well 
off and educated you are more likely to vote BJP, but if you are from an
 upper caste group as well, the chances are even higher. </p><p>The 
BJP's social base reflects all the signs of a party of the privileged. 
This makes the Indian upper class one of the safest vote banks of all. 
Comparing the caste composition of the BJP vote in the traditional old 
areas of the Jana Sangh and those states in which the BJP has become a 
force in the past decade shows that in the new areas of conquest it has 
less of an upper caste bias.</p><p> Compulsions of building social 
alliances have forced it to bring other castes and communities into its 
fold. Take Gujarat, where the need to bring in OBCs has given it a 
broader support base on which to build. In the rest of the country, 
particularly the south, the BJP is struggling to develop a clear 
profile.<br><br>Can the BJP take advantage of its infancy in these areas
 and develop into a true mass party? Or will it be unable to break free 
of the weight of its own history?<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-3_small_112812122749.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:149px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-3_large_112812122749.jpg','window','status=no,resize=yes,toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes,width=814,height=821'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>UF combines different social profiles</b><br></p><p>Like the congress, the national picture of the United Front
 (minus the LF) support is a very artificial indicator of its social 
base. It includes different parties with different social profiles.There
 are two main patterns in the data from the 1996 election.</p><p>In 
states like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Assam they garner support from
 a broad swathe of society. In these states the UF partners campaign on a
 mainly regional programme which cuts across caste-community lines.<br></p><p>In
 Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, the UF is identified not with a regional but a
 social justice plank. Here the Samajwadi Party (SP)Janata Dal (JD) 
votes contain a very strong support from the OBCs and Muslims.<br></p><p>The
 appeal may not be only to caste, but it has a strong caste resonance. A
 discordant note is struck in Orissa, where the votes for Biju Patnaik's
 anti-Mandal JD largely came from the upper caste.<br><br>Yet these 
different streams can continue to coexist, for the regionalisation of 
Indian politics allows them to campaign on their own agendas in their 
own areas, whilst broad cooperation has few costs and can be mutually 
very rewarding.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-5_small_112812014451.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:150px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-5_larg_112812014451.jpg','window','status=no,resize=no,toolbar=no,scrollbars=no,width=800,height=419'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>LF is competing along class lines</b><br></p><p>The ideology of a party is often a poor guide to its social
 base. But in the case of the Left Front (LF) there is some 
correspondence between its theory of class mobilization and its support 
structure. In terms of caste, the LF votes are spread over all the caste
 groupings and communities, including the upper castes.</p><p>They get a
 surprisingly high level of support from the SCs and fairly high from 
the Muslims. But that is largely because the states where LF has its 
base have a higher proportion of Dalit and Muslim population.</p><p>A 
look at the class base shows a clear and consistent pattern. An 
overwhelming majority of its support comes from the poor and the very 
poor. Communism does not seem to be an urban middle class phenomenon in 
India.<br><br>In Kerala, Tripura and West Bengal, the LF has managed to 
keep the political agenda focussed on issues that play along class 
lines, and the voters have responded. Outside its strongholds the 
class-based approach has failed to attract votes for the LF. With 
strongly localised support and appeal across the castes the LF resembles
 the regional parties of the UF in terms of social base. Another awkward
 piece in the UF jigsaw.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-6_small_112812014451.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:150px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-6_larg_112812014451.jpg','window','status=no,resize=no,toolbar=no,scrollbars=no,width=800,height=419'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>BSP gets all its support from the weakest</b><br></p><p>Kanshi ram had made it clear his party had no room for the 
upper caste; expectedly, the BSP is solidly founded on Dalit support. 
This leaves it a small party, but one with a distinct and stable social 
profile; opposite that of the BJP.<br><br>The BSP has had some success 
in Uttar Pradesh in broadening its social support to the lower OBCs and 
the Muslims. This development was crucial to its ideology of a 'bahujan'
 mobilisation, since the category was always meant to include 
non-Dalits.</p><p> Outside Uttar Pradesh, the BSP has made little 
headway in gaining the confidence of any other section. It remains to be
 seen if it can retain the Muslim votes it secured in 1996 after 
entering into the infamous alliance with the BJP.<br><br>The BSP faces 
the dilemma of widening the support base with the consequent diluting of
 its identity as the party of a particular social group, or remaining a 
small but socially coherent party wielding influence only as long as it 
is in a pivotal position.<br><br>The real challenge for the party is to 
develop a 'bahujan' unity central to its ideology. The fate of its 
attempts to build a Dalit-Adivasi alliance in Madhya Pradesh will test 
it again this time.<br></p><div class="itg-mosimage"><div class="itgimage"><img  title=""  class="" alt="" src="https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-7_small_112812014451.jpg" loading="lazy" /></div><div class="clicktoenlarge" style="width:200px;margin-right:15px text-align:center" valign="bottom"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.open('https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.dev?url=https%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Fsites%2Fmedia2%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstories%2F1993December%2Fparty-7_larg_112812014451.jpg','window','status=no,resize=no,toolbar=no,scrollbars=no,width=800,height=348'); return false;" rel="dofollow">Click here to Enlarge</a></div></div><b>CLASS factor reinforces CASTE</b><br></p><p>The influence of economic groups is less visible than the social 
categories of caste and community. Yet the research on Indian elections 
shows that now the voter has a clear class profile. Whether the voter is
 rich or poor is about as important in his voting decision as is his 
caste or community. These are not two separate effects.</p><p> The class
 factor goes with the caste. Those who belong to 'lower' castes also 
tend to be poor, and the upper caste Hindus tend to be better off. 
What's more, the class profile of major parties is such that both the 
effects tend to operate in the same direction and reinforce each other. 
Congress gets more support from the poor than the rich, but the 
difference is not very stark. The slope for the UF is sharper. </p><p>Its
 vote share among the very poor is nearly twice that of its support 
among the rich. The LF depends mainly on the poor and the very poor for 
its votes. The BSP depends exclusively on these sections.The picture is 
neatly reversed in the case of the BJP.</p><p> Its class profile looks 
like an inverted pyramid. Its vote share among the economically most 
privileged is more than double as compared to those below the poverty 
line. Clearly, the BJP combines economic and social privileges.</p><div id="tab-link-wrapper-plugin"><div class="authors__container"><div class="authors__by"><div class="authlable">Published By: </div><div class="authdetaisl">AtMigration </div></div><div class="published__on"><div class="authlable">Published On: </div><div class="authdetaisl">Feb 2, 1998</div></div></div><div class="sendros">--- ENDS ---</div></div></div>

Is it all caste and class, as we have always believed? Do vote banks exist? Yogendra Yadav explodes some myths surrounding the social basis of voting behaviour in India, and analyses where parties draw their support from.

India Today

Blurred battlelines - India Today

Some myths surrounding the social basis of voting behaviour in India

Blurred battlelines

Senior Congress leader K C Venugopal criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for attempting to polarise Kerala's society, which is known for its pluralism. He highlighted the BJP's struggle to gain relevance in the state ahead of the Assembly elections.

KC Venugopal rejects PM Modi’s ‘Kerala shift’ pitch, backs UDF strength.

congress general secretary KC Venugopal- File Photo

BJP doesn't understand Kerala, struggling for relevance: Venugopal after PM's rally

Raj Thackeray used humour and sharp political quips while addressing a Mumbai gathering with Uddhav Thackeray, joking about post-poll politics and shifting loyalties. 


Thackeray cousins

Even my doctor changed party, Raj Thackeray quips while sharing stage with Uddhav

Karan Johar defended Varun Dhawan against trolls over his smile in Border 2. The filmmaker called the film a sure-shot winner.

Karan Johar defends Varun Dhawan against trolls, calls the film sure shot winner

Karan Johar

The US might be looking to woo Bangladesh's Islamist party, Jamaat-e-Islami, reports The Washington Post, going by an American diplomat's interaction in Dhaka. Jamaat, which has a pro-Pakistan tilt, is likely to show a strong performance in the February polls. Drawing the Jamaat close might hurt DC's ties with New Delhi, warn experts.

The US has started making inroads with the Jamaat as the party gathers steam ahead of the February 12 Bangladesh elections. 

US notes Bangladesh's Islamist turn, looks to woo Jamaat. DC-Delhi ties at risk?

Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) working President K.T. Rama Rao after the enquiry asked the government to stop playing "diversion games" and focus on delivering the 420 promises made to the people of Telangana, asserting that the BRS will continue to expose the government’s failures every single day.

Scripted drama to mask governance failures: KTR slams Congress after SIT enquiry

Play Time!

Border 2

Shashi Tharoor

PM Modi

Border 2 Movie Review

Donald Trump

Delhi Weather

Basant Panchami

Davos 2026

T20 World Cup

Dhurandhar

Jana Nayagan

Jaipur Literature Festival

WPL 2026

AR Rahman

Budget

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s election rally in poll-bound Kerala on Thursday saw a warm and light-hearted moment when he paused his speech to acknowledge a young child in the crowd holding up his picture, drawing loud applause. Modi asked the boy to hand over the photograph, write his home address on the back, and promised to write to him personally, directing SPG personnel to handle the picture carefully as a token of the child’s affection. 

PM Modi's Kerala  rally.

You’ll get tired beta: PM’s warm moment with child holding his pic at Kerala rally

 Amidst inclement weather and heavy snowfall, a team of Udhampur police rescued 12 individuals, including women and children, who were stranded at Chochru Galla in the upper ridges of the Basantgarh area.

Udhampur Police Rescue 12 People Stranded In Heavy Snow

Udhampur police rescue 12 people stranded in heavy snowfall in J&K's Basantgarh

Ajith Kumar's fans took the celebrations too seriously as they burst crackers inside a theatre hall during Mankatha screening. The film re-released in South India on January 23.

Ajith Mankatha celebrations

Watch: Ajith's fans burst crackers for Mankantha intro scene inside auditorium

In an exclusive interview with India Today TV Consulting Editor Rajdeep Sardesai at Davos, Somalia's Deputy Prime Minister Salah Ahmed Jama spoke in fluent Hindi and slammed Donald Trump for his remarks and recalled his student days in India. 

Download App

Subscribe to India Today Print + Digital. Your First Month Is On Us. ₹299/month thereafter. Cancel anytime.

Some myths surrounding the social basis of voting behaviour in India

Is it all caste and class, as we have always believed? Do vote banks exist? Yogendra Yadav explodes some myths surrounding the social basis of voting behaviour in India, and analyses where parties draw their support from.

PUBLICATIONS

TELEVISION

EVENTS

RADIO

GAMING

USEFUL LINKS

PRINTING

WELFARE

DISTRIBUTION

SYNDICATIONS

WEBSITES

EDUCATION