Manu Chhabria's prime acquisitions in shambles with slew of cases closing in on him

Not So Innocent Abroad: For Manohar Rajaram Chhabria, ruling by proxy from dubai over his many possessions in India isn't very easy nowDialling him isn't easy. While you hold on for the takeover tycoon to come on the line at his corporate headquarters in Dubai, there is no music. Instead, a well modulated voice chirpily exhorts you to shop with them - Jumbo - for Casio products, Sony television sets, multinational appliances and Japanese cars. And as if to punctuate the message, the voice says at the end: "We make it happen."If only Manohar Rajaram Chhabria could say so too. Just 10 years ago, Chhabria - previously a Lamington Road trader - was on top of the world with acquisitions like tyre giant Dunlop, the 110-year-old liquor conglomerate Shaw Wallace and Company (SWC), Mather & Platt, Hindustan Dorr Oliver, among other names. To announce his arrival, Chhabria had told INDIA TODAY of his ambition in 1989: "I want to be among the Fortune 100 groups of the world."He even donned grey flannels and cardigan to attend classes at the hallowed Harvard Business School. But the course obviously wasn't good enough. At least for Chhabria. He now finds himself virtually at the wrong end of the road. Dunlop is sick and has approached the BIFR. SWC is facing 110 winding-up petitions filed by 178 creditors.Orson, the fledgling electronics company Chhabria floated to feed the consumerist urges of a growing Indian middle class, is shut for good. At Mather & Platt, the service company, the union has petitioned the Company Law Board (CLB) to remove Chhabria from the driving seat.Why Takeovers Went UnderStripping group companies of their assets for funds to be siphoned off to repay loans, leading to a cash haemorrhage.Failure of management. Too many top people shuffled for any stability of growth. Besides, Chhabria failed to attract the best professional talents.No financial discipline. When the top management does the untenable, the ones lower down the rungs naturally follow it.Lack of resources. The companies under Chhabria failed to expand, modernise and compete as both project finance and working capital dried up.Borrowing to pay. Excessive borrowings led to unbearable interest burden that overshadowed any gains made in operational efficiency. Shaw Wallace may be put on the BIFR stretcher under interest payment obligations alone.Missing in action. As Chhabria must stay away from India to avoid investigation, leaving his daughter Komal Wazir to proxy for him at board meetings, the companies are without a command chain.There is no good news on the personal front either. Pinned down in Dubai and unable to visit India, Chhabria is barely a step away from being dubbed a fugitive by the Union Government. The charges he faces are longer than the proverbial yard. He figures in a CBI case and a case filed by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. His creditors are hounding him. West Bengal Chief Minister Jyoti Basu has written to the prime minister seeking a probe into the affairs of Dunlop, which has failed to clear workers' dues for six months now. The Department of Company Affairs (DCA) wants nine government nominees - virtually a takeover - on the board of SWC. Add to this the hostile environment Chhabria has created around himself by ceaseless battles with executives, former associates and his own brother, Kishore.If there is trouble back home, things aren't very pretty across the Gulf either. With Sony Gulf establishing a presence at the Jebel Ali free trade zone, Chhabria finds his turf being cut into. Jumbo's turnover has dropped by 400 million dirham (Rs 420 crore) to around 1 billion dirham (Rs 1,050 crore). Chhabria has had to sell a substantial part of his equity in Jumbo - 20 percent at $17 million (Rs 68 crore) - to one of the biggest groups in the UAE, Al Rostamani (which the earlier partner Seddeeq was holding for him). That has given him some breathing space in terms of cash flow but his problems are growing. Last month, the DCA called for a probe of the SWC affairs under Section 408 of the Companies Act. And the capital was recently abuzz with speculation of a warrant being issued, for Chhabria has managed to dodge the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate. There are no easy answers to why the takeover tycoon, who boasted a group sales figure of over Rs 1,100 crore and Rs 68.5 crore profit before tax in 1989, now finds his profits shrivelling. The vice-chairman of a large corporate house who has known Chhabria for some time, says he is essentially a trader who chose the takeover route, looking for quick returns. "But acquisitions in manufacturing take some time for capital appreciation and growth, and he could not wait."A former associate who worked as a top-level executive with Chhabria says his (Chhabria's) game plan was to borrow abroad, acquire in India and repay. "He borrowed, say, at around Rs 15 to the dollar. With the reforms, the dollar shot up, touching Rs 27 by 1992-93. That made the rupee cost of repayment unsustainable." .preferred-source-banner{ margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom:10px;}A former Chhabria executive says Chhabria also failed to bring any managerial input in terms of talent and capabilities into the companies he took over. Worse, his management style and language sent many packing home. SWC had five managing directors in six years.In a letter to the CLB, L.C. Gupta, a nominee on the SWC board, charged the management of the company on six counts. These include:Keeping the board of directors in the dark on key matters.Financial mismanagement to the extent that for two years in a row (1995-96 and 1996-97), the auditors of the company have stated their inability "to express an opinion whether the balance sheet and profit-and-loss account give a true picture".Nominee institutional directors are voted out.Mismanagement and fraud, with an investment of about Rs 70 crore in six Guwahati companies without due diligence.Inability of the company to pay creditors' dues.Significantly, soon after he shot off the letter to the CLB chief, the SWC board managed to invoke a technicality and get the CLB to recall Gupta from the board of the SWC.The Slow PoisonDunlop's net profit today is a third of what is was in 1989, and its units in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu are locked out.Shaw Wallace has posted only Rs 34 lakh net profit in 1997; it was Rs 9.39 crore in 1989.Shaw Wallace's sales have dropped 8 percent in the past one year.Mather & Platt's profit now is one-thirty sixth of that nine years ago.Gordon Woodroffe's sales have plummeted 40 percent in a decade under Chhabria.Hindustan Dorr-Oliver's net profit has been reduced to a quarter after the Chhabria takeover.While SWC was bled white, Dunlop too saw its resources siphoned off in a series of dubious transactions. In 1994-95, Dunlop bought software worth Rs 3 crore from SRG Finman and sold it at Rs 30 crore to SWC. A note to the DCA reports that while there is a cash receipt for the sum, there is no record of the transaction in the company's books. In 1996-97, Dunlop invested Rs 29.55 crore in Shaw Wallace Properties (SWP). According to company insiders, this was simply a routing transaction and SWP has no property worth a mention. Added to this are Chhabria's ceaseless battles with executives, former associates and his brother, dragging the taken-over blue chips into a dung-heap.Speaking from Dubai, Chhabria quips: "It is your perception that things have not worked out. Not mine. Nobody can question the fact that SWC is doing well. We are the largest with 25 distilleries and 10 breweries. Royal Challenge and Haywards are the strongest brands.Who else or which other company has its produce - 1.2 million cases - pre-sold? What is surprising is the manner in which things have been blown out of proportion. What is happening in SWC is simply consolidation of debt, so that we can settle the matter."Chhabria Charge - SheetFera: Siphoning off Rs 70 crore under the garb of investments in six Guwahati-based letter-box companies, to be squirrelled away to the credit of M.R. Chhabria abroad. P.L. Narsimhan, former director, finance, was arrested and summons have been issued to Chhabria.Income Tax: Taxmen who raided the premises of SWC and those of executives believe over Rs 130 crore has been siphoned from the company. Funds parked in tax shelters were encashed through brokers. Between Rs 50 and Rs 60 per case for liquor were paid in cheques for sales promotion and taken back as cash.Department of Company Affairs: In an inspection, Dunlop India Ltd was found to have left doubtful debts, acquired shares without proper approval, and delayed depositing provident fund dues and transfering unpaid dividend.Directorate of Revenue Intelligence: Orson Electronics and Chhabria charged with under invoicing imports.Central Bureau of Investigation: Charges against Chhabria for criminal conspiracy and fraud. Also facing charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act in the Rs 20.8 crore Bank of Maharashtra cheating case.Hong Kong Court: A petition against Chhabria challenges his stated claim of ownership of 37.8 percent of SWC shares that gives him control over the liquor conglomerate. The matter is expected to come up for hearing shortly.What about Dunlop? "It is a labour problem. What else is it? We are trying to resolve it, which is why we went to BIFR. We have gone to the board for respite, for relief. For permission to divest so that we could put the house in order. But before that, there is talk about a takeover. How can that come through? Who owns the shares?"However, there are other frontiers that he cannot ignore. A petition - reportedly filed at the behest of liquor baron Vijay Mallya - that is hanging fire in Hong Kong actually contests Chhabria's ownership of SWC. Chhabria acquired SWC in 1985 by buying out 37.8 percent of its shares held in R.G. Shaw & Co. These shares were bought by a shell company, Carrasco Investments Limited, controlled by two other investment firms, Alexina and Keysberg (apparently a Chhabria company) which held one share each in Carrasco.According to the papers filed in Hong Kong, Chhabria's contention of ownership has been challenged in his said control over Carrasco through Keysberg. The owners of Keysberg allegedly allotted themselves 9,998 additional shares and by taking full control of Carrasco managed the ownership of the SWC shares held by R.G. Shaw & Co. In other words, by that one deed, Keysberg had managed to convert what was a joint venture with Alexina into fullfledged ownership. The owners of Alexina then decided to file a suit in Hong Kong in 1992. The suit comes up for hearing in the next few weeks.As for the cases in India, with such large stakes in this country, he surely cannot run the risk of having his name posted on the "wanted" list. As of now, Chhabria is playing with his cards close to his chest. For both he and his detractors know that it is the outcome of these cases that will eventually determine whether Chhabria is able to rescue his acquisitions and his own name or watch them being ground one after another.Published By: AtMigration Published On: May 18, 1998--- ENDS ---

Download App

Subscribe to India Today Print + Digital. Your First Month Is On Us. ₹299/month thereafter. Cancel anytime.

Manu Chhabria's prime acquisitions in shambles with slew of cases closing in on him

With a slew of cases closing in on him both in India and abroad, yesterday's takeover tycoon and his prime acquisitions are in a shambles.

PUBLICATIONS

TELEVISION

EVENTS

RADIO

GAMING

USEFUL LINKS

PRINTING

WELFARE

DISTRIBUTION

SYNDICATIONS

WEBSITES

EDUCATION